Who were Taluqdars?
Taluqdars were landowners and local magnates in the feudal structure of pre-colonial India, particularly prominent in Awadh (Oudh). They held large estates or taluqs and exercised considerable power and influence over the local population. Many of them maintained small armies with fortifications. They were known as their titles "Raja". Taluqdars were often hereditary landholders, passing down their estates through generations.
Impact of British Policies on Taluqdars:
1. Dispossession and Disarmament:
- With the annexation of Awadh in 1856, British policies aimed at dispossessing the taluqdars. The British assumed that taluqdars had acquired their land illegitimately, leading to their disarmament and the destruction of their forts.
2. Land Redistribution:
- The Summary Settlement of 1856 sought to redistribute land by removing taluqdars from their positions. The British intended to settle the land with the actual cultivators, thereby diminishing the influence of the taluqdars.
3. Impact on Socio-Economic Status:
- The dispossession had profound socio-economic repercussions. Taluqdars, who had held significant sway in local affairs, saw their status decline. The traditional structure of patronage and loyalty between taluqdars and peasants was disrupted.
4. Overassessment of Revenue:
- The revenue policies, particularly the overassessment of revenue in some areas, further impacted taluqdars. The British, in their attempts to increase revenue, subjected the taluqdars and peasants to higher tax burdens.
Taluqdars' Reactions:
1. Resistance and Rebellion:
- Taluqdars, especially in areas like Awadh where the annexation was deeply unpopular, resisted British control. Many taluqdars participated in the Indian Rebellion of 1857, aligning themselves with other dissenting groups against the British East India Company.
In summary, the British policies, particularly the Summary Settlement and disarmament measures, aimed to control and diminish the influence of taluqdars. However, the resistance from taluqdars during the uprising of 1857 demonstrated that these measures did not quell the deep-seated discontent and opposition to British rule in Awadh.
Comentarios